NYNY Week 1 weigh in

[frood]

Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)

I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If I
had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal. However,
I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The composite
weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!

Woo Hoo!

--
Wendy
http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
de-fang email address to reply

[Carey1003]

I finally have to ask what is NYNY?

Carey

[Lesanne]

Great going frood!!

"frood" > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>

[Brenda Hammond]

Good job Wendy!
--
Brenda
209/174/150
NYNY goal 160

"frood" > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>

[Brenda Hammond]

It's the newest weight loss challenge that the group is participating in.
Here's a link to the website.

http://www.angelfire.com/me4/travelgirl/nyny.htm

--
Brenda
209/174/150
NYNY goal 160


"Carey1003" > wrote in message
...
> I finally have to ask what is NYNY?
>
> Carey

[Elaine Kirkham]

Yeaaa! A good loss, Wendy! Congratulations.
Elaine K
331.4/202.8/179

frood wrote:

> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal. However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply

[Prairie Roots]

Good going, Wendy.

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:22:42 GMT, "frood"
> wrote:

>Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
>I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If I
>had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal. However,
>I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
>weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The composite
>weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
>Woo Hoo!

--
Prairie Roots
232/180.8/WW goal 145
joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

[Nathalie W]

Good loss, Wendy!
--
Nathalie from Belgium
134.1/103.1/minigoal 102.3 Goal 68 Kg
295.6/227.3/minigoal 225.6/Goal 150 pounds
NYNY 227.3/227.3/214

"frood" > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>

[Fred]

Congrats on that loss - it is a good one

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:22:42 GMT, "frood"
> wrote:

>Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
>I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If I
>had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal. However,
>I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
>weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The composite
>weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
>Woo Hoo!

[Erin Marsh]

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:22:42 GMT, "frood"
> wrote:

>Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)

Woohoo, great loss Wendy :-)

--
Erin in NZ
125/90.5/75 kgs
275.3/199.3/165 lbs

NYNY goal 180.6lbs (82 kilos)

"It is not the mountain we conquer, it is ourselves"
Sir Edmund Hilary

[SuzyQ]

Congratulations Wendy.
--
SuzyQ
Weight 124
WW Lifetime Membership Feb 03

"frood" > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>

[Paper]

On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:22:42 GMT, "frood"
> wrote:

YEEHAW!!! Good for you!

Paper
250.6/222.8/150
Improvement - not Perfection

>Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
>I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If I
>had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal. However,
>I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
>weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The composite
>weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
>Woo Hoo!

[Connie Walsh]

frood wrote:
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal. However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>

I think you are the first one to record a loss in the challenge!!!
Congrats!!! 1.8 is a great loss!! I like the idea of doing the average
of the weekly weights, too bad I can't convince weight watchers to do
that :-(.

Connie

--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/218.5/155
10% 241.5/218.5/217.5
25 lbs lost 241.5/218.5/216.5

[Sonya]

>"frood" wrote:

>Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)

Congrats on the loss, Wendy!


Sonya
199/185.2/180 (10%)

[Catherine White]

Congratulations on your loss!
--
Take Care
Catherine
154/134.4/136
Lifetime 6/99
Next personal goal 133.2





"frood" > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>

[Kristin]

Great loss, Wendy! Keep up the good work!

--

~Kristin O~
272/237.4/172

Here's our FAQ: http://www.didian.com/asdww/ and welcome notice:
http://www.geocities.com/welcomenotice/index.html



"frood" > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>

[Miss Violette]

good for you, Lee
frood > wrote in message
...
> Week 1 - 160.6 (a 1.8 loss!)
>
> I'm now doing daily weights, and averaging them out for weekly totals. If
I
> had taken yesterday's single weight, I would have made my 10% goal.
However,
> I switched to averaged weights because 2 weeks ago, I showed a gain on the
> weigh-in day, which was the only day that I was up! Oh, well. The
composite
> weight is better data, so I'm sticking to that!
>
> Woo Hoo!
>
> --
> Wendy
> http://griffinsflight.com/Quilting/quilt1.htm
> de-fang email address to reply
>
>
>