swwc week 12

[ray miller]

down 2 to 201

SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
think I'm back on track again (famous last words).

The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.

Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
gremlins under control soon.

1. 205
2. 203
3. 202
4. 201
5. 204
6. 202
7. 201
8. 203
9. 207
10. 205
11. 203
12. 201

Ray
--
rmnsuk
overall - 273/203/182
swwc - 205/203/192

[Nathalie W]

It might not be a huge loss, but it 's 4 pounds you 'll never see again, so
congrats for that!
--
Nathalie from Belgium
134.1/103.1/minigoal 102.3 Goal 68 Kg
295.6/227.3/minigoal 225.6/Goal 150 pounds
SWWC 238/227.3/226

"ray miller" > wrote in message
...
> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray
> --
> rmnsuk
> overall - 273/203/182
> swwc - 205/203/192

[Lesanne]

Bravo Ray!! You are so so so close to Onederland I can hardly stand it.

"ray miller" > wrote in message
...
> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray
> --
> rmnsuk
> overall - 273/203/182
> swwc - 205/203/192

[Brenda Hammond]

We'll both do much better in the next challenge Ray.
--
Brenda
209/174/150
SWWC goal 165

"ray miller" > wrote in message
...
> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray
> --
> rmnsuk
> overall - 273/203/182
> swwc - 205/203/192

[Elaine Kirkham]

Weigh to go, Ray! Congratulations on losing those 2 pounds. I don't think
the idea of the challenge is to worry about succeeding but to focus your
mind on losing and that worked. Success is just an added bonus but not
really necessary as you are a success if you lose anything at all.
Elaine K
331.4/194.2/179

ray miller wrote:

> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray
> --
> rmnsuk
> overall - 273/203/182
> swwc - 205/203/192

[Connie Walsh]

Ray:

Congrats for losing another 2 and getting back on track.

Connie

--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/218.5/155
10% 241.5/218.5/217.5
25 lbs lost 241.5/218.5/216.5


ray miller wrote:
> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray

[Fred]

Congrats on the loss and being lower than for a long time.

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:12:24 GMT, ray miller
> wrote:

>down 2 to 201
>
>SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
>pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
>think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
>The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
>christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
>Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
>the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
>your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
>gremlins under control soon.
>
>1. 205
>2. 203
>3. 202
>4. 201
>5. 204
>6. 202
>7. 201
>8. 203
>9. 207
>10. 205
>11. 203
>12. 201
>
>Ray

[Prairie Roots]

You may not have reached your SWWC goal, but being at your lowest
weight in years sounds like a most excellent accomplishment. Please
don't let anything overshadow your success. Despite your downs and ups
and downs, your motivation has carried you through. You haven't quit,
which means you haven't failed.

Prairie Roots

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:12:24 GMT, ray miller
> wrote:

>down 2 to 201
>
>SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
>pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
>think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
>The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
>christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
>Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
>the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
>your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
>gremlins under control soon.
>
>1. 205
>2. 203
>3. 202
>4. 201
>5. 204
>6. 202
>7. 201
>8. 203
>9. 207
>10. 205
>11. 203
>12. 201
>
>Ray

[Erin Marsh]

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:12:24 GMT, ray miller
> wrote:

>down 2 to 201
>
>SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
>pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
>think I'm back on track again (famous last words).

That's all positive stuff Ray. You'll be in Onederland one of these
days, very soon I'd say. Good for you :-)

--
Erin in NZ
125/90/75 kgs
275.3/198.2/165 lbs

"It is not the mountain we conquer, it is ourselves"
Sir Edmund Hilary

[Kristin]

Wow Ray... GREAT! You are almost in Onederland, can you BELIEVE it?!!!
Keep it up!

--

~Kristin O~
272/239.2/172

Here's our FAQ: http://www.didian.com/asdww/ and welcome notice:
http://www.geocities.com/welcomenotice/index.html



"ray miller" > wrote in message
...
> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray
> --
> rmnsuk
> overall - 273/203/182
> swwc - 205/203/192

[Sonya]

> ray miller
wrote:

>down 2 to 201

Great job on the 2 pounds lost, Ray!

Sonya
199/188.2/180 (10%)

[SuzyQ]

Congratulations Ray.
--
SuzyQ
Weight 124
WW Lifetime Membership Feb 03

"ray miller" > wrote in message
...
> down 2 to 201
>
> SWWC wasn't the most successful for me. I started at 205 and lost 4
> pounds overall to 201. But 201 is my lowest weight for years and I
> think I'm back on track again (famous last words).
>
> The next problems for me are the holiday coming up, and the fact that
> christmas stuff has started appearing in the shops already.
>
> Thanks so much Anna for doing the challenge. It certainly helped in
> the last three weeks to try to actually lose SOMETHING overall. All
> your hard work is appreciated. Hope you get your illness and computer
> gremlins under control soon.
>
> 1. 205
> 2. 203
> 3. 202
> 4. 201
> 5. 204
> 6. 202
> 7. 201
> 8. 203
> 9. 207
> 10. 205
> 11. 203
> 12. 201
>
> Ray
> --
> rmnsuk
> overall - 273/203/182
> swwc - 205/203/192