Diet Season is Over

Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:02:27 -0500 in article
Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Luna wrote:

In article ,
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because
the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the
header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it.

Um, it was already crossposted when you decided to crosspost it.

See how "skillfully" Chung makes his lying even more dreadfully
apparent. He changed the quoted line to make it read something
opposite what it was to begin with.

Here's what it originally said: "Um, it wasn't crossposted until you
decided to crosspost it."

So the liar Chung is shown to lie about whether he started the
crosspost (he did) and he compounds his falsity by changing somebody
else's words to try to hide his first fakery. To help him slip-slide
past his fraudulence.

Poor Chung the unethical fraud.

Correct.

--
Matti Narkia

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Steve wrote:

On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:16:04 -0500, Matti Narkia wrote
(in message ):

Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:10:24 -0500 in article
Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Now lets keep this up without the insults.

hiss

Truth insults the untruthful.

hiss

Chung is truthful.

And it starts here. This is Chung's change of someone else's words. It
originally said, "Chung is a fraud."

Correct.

--
Matti Narkia

And Matti never agreed with the statement above. The agreement was
with the original, "Chung is a fraud" comment.

Correct

Correct.

Same with these two "correct" comments. They're parodies of Chung's
habit of leaving long posts that endorse him or his fantasy-world 2PD
and adding a few words to the end.

Bob Pastorio

And CHung adds my last name where it wasn't before.

Thanks :-)

And adds his final comment to try to make it look like something
happened that didn't. Chung is a liar.

Bob

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:10:24 -0500 in article
Bob wrote:

Chung is a truthful.

LOL Here's more Chunglish. He *says* that English is his first
language, but you know how he lies about everything else...

Somebody tell Chung that if he's going to forge posts, at least try to
reach the level of language skill of his "mark." That would be me
since what I really said was, "Chung is a fraud."

"Chung is a truthful." Hilarious. I hope he writes prescriptions
better than that.

Bob

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Dawn Taylor wrote:

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:45:55 -0500, Bob announced in
front of God and everybody:

Steve wrote:

On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:16:04 -0500, Matti Narkia wrote
(in message ):

Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:10:24 -0500 in article
Bob wrote:

Chung is truthful.

Chung only changed this line. It used to read, "Chung is a fraud."

Just continue reading with that restoration in mind.

Correct.

Matti Narkia

Correct

Correct.

Oh yeah.

Dawn

Yes. It's correct. You can look it up.

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp Http://www.chungfraud.com

Tell 'em Joe sent ya.

Bob Pastorio

Originally, my last name wasn't in the sig. Chung added it, probably
for my "convenience."

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

What could Chung be praying for with the lengthy list he says he needs
to pray for. Some "prayer-macro" for everybody so he doesn't have to
give it any more thought than he uses for his snip and hiss posts?

Bob (see above)

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote in message ...

Luna wrote:

In article ,
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because
the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the
header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it.

Um, it wasn't crossposted until you decided to crosspost it.

hiss

hiss

Bob "raging and self-confident" Pastorio

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the author
of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be trimmed, I
have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Bob
(2) Report Bob to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

Bob's pathological obsessions are related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet discussion(s).
His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and has been conducted in the
spirit of community service. His motivation has been entirely altruistic and has arisen
from his religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the
health of folks He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently opposed to
the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every perceived weakness of
the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s), certain
parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward its author.
The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message then try to discredit
the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone who
posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion value and with
the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following
observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to achieve
near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight becomes
near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs of the
actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to attack
Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to libel him. One
notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful folks
hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or as
lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line third-party
resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims that
credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon posters
who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided
insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the din of
hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote in message ...

Luna wrote:

In article ,
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because
the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the
header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it.

Um, it wasn't crossposted until you decided to crosspost it.

Poor Chung deletes my words so they don't prove his fakery still
further. And he leaves my name in and adds to it. LOL And can't trim
attributions so the posts make sense. Poor desperate Chung, acting
like there's anything left for him here. Frantically snipping and
Hissing as though anyone could still find anything to believe from him.

Bob "raging and self-confident" Pastorio

LOLOLOL

Poor Chung can't even come up with his own insults any more. He's so
panicky with all the snip and hiss going on around him that he's
losing it completely.

A post the other day said:

Carol T posted:
"Go find yourself a fool elsewhere to play with, Bob's not one."

Bob said:
Seems a rather vivid contrast with Chung who's well captured with
these words, [that Carol T posted in her note] "A wise man fears and
departs from evil, But a fool rages and is self-confident." NKJ
Proverbs 14:16

Swaggering Chung and strutting Mu_cus rage and are self-confident.

Poverty of the soul, the two.

Chung brings out his masterwork. The dazzling "I'm rubber, you're
glue" gambit so favored by the mentally deficient and the immature.

Poor overwhelmed, corrupt Chung.

Bob

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Luna wrote:

In article ,
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because
the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the
header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it.

Um, it was already crossposted when you decided to crosspost it.

hiss

Bob "raging and self-confident" Pastorio

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the
author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be
trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a few
suggestions:

(1) Yell at Bob
(2) Report Bob to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

Bob's pathological obsessions are related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is
described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and has
been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation has been entirely
altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely
gave of Himself to better the health of folks He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently opposed to
the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every perceived weakness
of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion
thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s), certain
parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward its author.
The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message then try to
discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone who
posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion value and
with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following
observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to achieve
near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight
becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs of
the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to
attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to libel
him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful folks
hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their fallen
hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or as
lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line
third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims
that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon
posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided
insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its
author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the din
of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

Matti Narkia wrote:

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:26:27 -0700 in article
"Mark.net" wrote:

I think the 2pid diet is great.
Since you can basically eat whatever you want without worrying about health,
and the only restriction is that it be 2pid...

Trying to work up a week's meal plan here...

I LOVE Mr Goodbar.
1 bar - 1.75oz - 264 calories
That means I could have 18.3 Mr Goodbars in a day to hit my 2pid limit.
That would only be 4827 calories!

Ok, day 2.
I feel like eating really healthy today.
Chex mix - 1 oz - 120 calories
To be 2pid I could have 32 oz in a day.
That would be 3840 calories.

Day 3.
It feels like a nutty day.
Pistachio nuts - 1 cup - 128 g - 713 calories
Being as 2pid as I can be, I could have 7.1 cups in a day.
That would only be 5053 calories!

Still working on days 4-7...

Finally! A diet where I can eat whatever I want and only worry about it
being 2pid!
I'm guaranteed heart health and weight loss on my 2pid diet!

I've heard somewhere that the doctor who invented 2pid diet has now
standardized it, and that everyone should now move to this new standardized
version, which has been named s2pid. Is there any truth in this?


No. The confusion comes from English being your fifth language :-)

Truth is simple.


--
Matti Narkia

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the
author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be
trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a
few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Matti
(2) Report Matti to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

Matti's pathological obsessions are related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD)
which is described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and
has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation has been
entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a Christian.
Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every
perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument
soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion
thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s),
certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward
its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message
then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone
who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion
value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following
observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight
becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs
of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to
attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to
libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful
folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their
fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or
as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line
third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims
that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon
posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided
insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its
author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the
din of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

Matti Narkia wrote:

Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:02:27 -0500 in article
Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Luna wrote:

In article ,
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because
the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the
header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it.

Um, it was already crossposted when you decided to crosspost it.

hiss
kiss kiss

--
Matti Narkia

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the
author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be
trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a few
suggestions:

(1) Yell at Matti
(2) Report Matti to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

Matti's pathological obsessions are related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which
is described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and has
been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation has been entirely
altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely
gave of Himself to better the health of folks He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently opposed to
the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every perceived weakness of
the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion
thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s), certain
parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward its author.
The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message then try to
discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone who
posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion value and
with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following
observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to achieve
near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight becomes
near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs of
the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to attack
Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to libel him. One
notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful folks
hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their fallen
hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or as
lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line
third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims that
credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon
posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided
insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its
author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the din
of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147

Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Bob wrote:

Steve wrote:

On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:16:04 -0500, Matti Narkia wrote
(in message ):

Fri, 06 Feb 2004 16:10:24 -0500 in article
Bob wrote:

Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Now lets keep this up without the insults.

hiss

Truth insults the untruthful.

hiss

Chung is truthful.

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Correct.

--
Matti Narkia

angry hiss

Correct

Correct.

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Bob Pastorio

hiss

Thanks :-)

hiss

Bob "raging and self-confident" Pastorio

You poor guy.

You remain in my prayers, neighbor.

FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message.
Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request
that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about
reading this message, a few suggestions:

(1) Yell at Bob
(2) Report Bob to his ISP
(3) Killfile this thread.
(4) Killfile me.
(5) Read about free speech.

Bob's pathological obsessions are related to the 2 pound diet approach
(2PD) which is described completely at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet
discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary
and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation
has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as
a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks
He touched:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp

From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently
opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on
every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the
argument soundly at every point:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp

These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this
discussion thread(s).

However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the
argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound
diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can
not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger."

Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is
someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming
discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars.

These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the
following observations were made:

(1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously.
(2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the
discussion(s).
(a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to
achieve near-ideal weight.
(b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their
weight becomes near-ideal.
(c) For (b) see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?V5D042C47
(3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s).
(4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive).
(5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line
(including jpegs of the actual diplomas).

Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have
tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were
attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp

When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the
hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in
support of their fallen hero.

Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either
actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are,
using the on-line third-party resources at:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp

where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous
claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked.

Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the
anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack):

(1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or
accountability).
(2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory
characters.
(3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver
one-sided insults.
(4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by
cross-posting.
(5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD
or its author.

and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file.

It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to
speed.

It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD
above the din of hissing from the peanut gallery.


Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

Andrew

--
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist
http://www.heartmdphd.com/

--
Who is the humblest person in the universe?

http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147