The 2PD-OMER Approach for permanent weight loss

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

Hahahahahahahahahaha...

Now it's also an acronym. Too, too funny. This house built on
intellectual sand has just had a second storey added. Oh, sure.
That'll make it stronger. Probably the negative testimonials will help
hold it up for the 90,000 people doing it with not one dropout.

Maybe Mel Gibson will make a movie about it. Guy with a lab coat
crucifies himself by nailing his hyper-inflated ego to the wall of
absurdity. Maybe get Jim Carrey to play Chung. Or Ronald McDonald.

LOL

Bob

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's
holy name.

May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His
infinite kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist


**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:


Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running
around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his
insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually
posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says
he writes honestly. Bwah...

LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking
and one for the feet in the mouth.

Poor, poor Chung...

Bob

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:


Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.

Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running
around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his
insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually
posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says
he writes honestly. Bwah...

LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking
and one for the feet in the mouth.

Poor, poor Chung...

Bob

Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.


You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's
holy name.

May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His
everlasting kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist


**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

"Bob (this one)" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Excerpt from http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

It has been my observation that the "negative" testimonials support the
2PD Approach *more* than the "positive" ones.

LOL Sure they do. What a splendid illustration of Chung's
deteriorating mental state. People offering good reasons why the 2PD
is weakly conceived and insufficiently detailed are somehow supporting
it. Sounds like something Winston Smith would like... War is peace.
Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

And in Chunglish, "Negative testimonials support."

And suddenly "observations" seem to have built-in conclusions. Just
like, oh, I dunno, reasoning. Which means that judgements are being
made. That Chung says he never does, while doing it. What a hoot.


Moreover, since publicly citing passages in the Holy Bible that support
the 2PD Approach (1/16/2005), the "negative" testimonials have been
crescendoing to such an unprecedented degree that the Lord has moved me
to rename the 2PD Approach as the 2PD-OMER Approach. OMER stands for
Original Method of Eating Reduction while also reminding us of the
"omer" described in Exodus 16:16. The recommended method of pronouncing
this is "the two pedomer approach."

hiss sputter hiss hiss

Sorry the 2PD-OMER Approach bothers you.

Actually, it looks like the bother is all Chung's. Poor guy's running
around hissing and sputtering in the sheer frustration of having his
insistent wackiness spotlighted. Changing what people have actually
posted. Deleting the parts that crush his fraudulent assertions. Says
he writes honestly. Bwah...

LOL The two pedometer approach, I'd say. One for the feet walking
and one for the feet in the mouth.

Poor, poor Chung...

Bob

Again, Lord Christ teaches from Matthew 5:

11Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely
say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad,
because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they
persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Chung has already seen the dissection of this passage to his deadly
detriment. He's like Goebbels. Repeat the lie often enough, repeat the
slanted propaganda often enough, repeat the self-excusing rationale
often enough and it becomes Chung's "truth." He fabricates his own
image and sadly, it's pure fabrication. NOw it looks like he's edging
toward considering himself a prophet.

Bwah...

Chung has re-re-re-reposted this quotation in reply to several
rational people, to contrast with him. Shame he doesn't seem to
understand it. Notice the word "falsely" in there? When the bad news
is the truth, that part falls away. And when the part about "because
of me" is scrutinized, then Chung is simply a big loser.

Bob