Chung's Many Failings. was herbal alternatives

"GaryG" wrote in message ...
"Phil" wrote in message
...
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:


Psst, I have an A1c of 5.1 with no meds or expensive
supplements. I can give you my solution for free.


Indeed, the diabetic 2PD-OMER Approach is for free:

If you going to pretend to be a doctor, you will have to improve your
grammar. It is either free, not "for" free, or it is for nothing.

I had a look at your various ego-droppings as listed in your earlier
post and I have a suggestion for you. Just add a sig to your posts that
says, "I am a ****wit, I know nothing about medicine and less about
Christianity". That way any newcomers could reach that rather obvious
conclusion without wading through all your ****. Think about it, you
would be doing a public service, and isn't that a part of being a good
Christian?

You obviously haven't read the Bible in depth as it does explain quite
clearly what an omer is. You might not care to, or more likely, you will
try to bull****, so I will prove you wrong.

Firstly, it is described "the tenth part of an ephah,

Exodus 16:36
Now an omer [is] the tenth [part] of an ephah.

Next, an ephah is mentioned in several places, and although not defined
exactly in modern terms you can see what its approximate size must be.

In Zechariah 5:6 - 5:10 it makes it clear that an ephah is large enough
to hold two women. Two women with wings no less, wings the Bible says,
like the wings of a stork. Now if you were right, and an omer is only
two pounds, those two women would have to fit into a twenty pound
container. Is this what you are saying, or are you disputing the
veracity of the Bible?

In Leviticus 19:36 it says that an ephah is an exact measure, not a
casual container of varying sizes. So we have an exact measure, large
enough to hold two women, and a verse that defines a omer as one tenth
of that measure. Now allow those women to be small, say only 100 lbs
each, and squashed together very closely in that ephah, and we are
looking at AT LEAST a container capable of holding 220-250 lb.

That would make a omer at least 22-25 pounds, AS DETERMINED BY YOUR OWN
BIBLE! The reality is that those women would weight 150lbs or better and
that they would require room to get into that ephah, so 300-350lbs would
probably be closer to the mark.

It seems that you know very little of medicine, less of the Bible.
You are a little like an A.A. Milne character, a being of very little
brain.

Why don't you go away and sit in a corner and actually READ the Bible
before making a fool of yourself again.


Oh, and you had better rename your, er, um, diet.

Phil

You may as well save your breath...Chung is an indefatigable nutcase. He
tends to post here in roughly two week cycles (bipolar?). He's been quiet
for a couple of weeks, but seems to be entering another "up" phase...be
patient, he'll probably go away again in a week or so.

FWIW, he does not care what others think of him, as his only purpose is to
promote the "truth" he thinks he hears in his head. In fact, he seems to
derive some weird sort of please when people abuse him...presumably, he
enjoys the attention, and being yelled at makes him feel persecuted (thus,
allowing him to see himself as a true "prophet").

If you Google his name, you'll see that he used to be more lucid and
rational, but seems to have become increasingly bizarre and hyperreligous
over the last few years.

Attempting to engage him in rational discourse about his cross-posting,
off-topic, antisocial behavior is unproductive. However, it can sometimes
be amusing as sport...just don't expect him to change.

GG

I used to use Agent to read sci.med.cardiology but gave up because of
Chung. Recently I thought I would try Google to read the group in the
hope that maybe something had been done about him but obviously it was
too much to hope for.
Back to the BBC for sensible postings.

wrote:
snip
I used to use Agent to read sci.med.cardiology but gave up because of
Chung. Recently I thought I would try Google to read the group in the
hope that maybe something had been done about him but obviously it
was
too much to hope for.
Back to the BBC for sensible postings.

What is "BBC?" Is it as effective as skipping over non-sensical posts?
;-)