Frequency of taking supplements

On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:20:18 GMT, "Jeff"
wrote:

I guess you are unable to back up your claims or explain away the fact that
vaccines save thousands of lives each year.

It is not my fault if you make claims that you cannot back up.

Someone funding a travel for Pizza Girl to a country where Yellow
Fewer is very common, without a vaccine.

?? :-)

(Getting scared PizzaGirl??)
(In your theory it should be the vaccine that does the killing??
Right??)

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:11:42 GMT, "Jeff"
wrote:

I hope that in the futue, vaccines will be available that are effective. I
think the NIH and Billy Gate's foundation are sponsoring research to develop
the vaccines.

Hope so too, but have seen more of Pizza Girls ilk trying to defeat
such remedies on religious grounds :-(

"Jeff" wrote in
ink.net:

It has nothing to do with her sex.

There is no evidence that members of one sex are any smarter, on
average, than members of the other one.

That's an important point. There does appear to be some evidence that
there are predominantly-male stupidities and predominantly-female
stupidities, but they tend to balance out. Michael Shermer wrote an
article about it a year or so ago. He pointed out that if you were to
attend a convention of people who believe they could communicate with the
dead you'd see far more women than men, and if that were your only sample
you'd conclude that women were more superstitious than men. And then he
pointed out that if you attended a convention of people who believe that
space aliens are performing experiments on us you'd find far more men,
and if that were your only sample you'd conclude that men were more
superstitious than women.

Social psychologist Carole Tavris has asserted (quite plausibly) that
most nonsense regarding sex differences in name_your_variable is
generated by fallaciously assuming that the measures of one sex (it can
be either one) constitute a "baseline" or "standard" from which the other
sex's measures are "deviant."