A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Men's Health article exerpt



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 18th, 2007, 06:02 PM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
UsenetID
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 185
Default Men's Health article exerpt

Perhaps the apparent bias against saturated fat is most evident in studies
on low-carbohydrate diets. Many versions of this approach are controversial
because they place no limitations on saturated-fat intake. As a result,
supporters of the diet-heart hypothesis have argued that low-carb diets will
increase the risk of heart disease. But published research doesn't show this
to be the case. When people on low-carb diets have been compared
head-to-head with those on low-fat diets, the low-carb dieters typically
scored significantly better on markers of heart disease, including small,
dense LDL cholesterol, HDL/LDL ratio, and triglycerides, which are a measure
of the amount of fat circulating in your blood.
For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut scientists
placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or low-fat diet. Those
who followed the low-carb diet consumed 36 grams of saturated fat per day
(22 percent of total calories), which represented more than three times the
amount in the low-fat diet. Yet despite this considerably greater intake of
saturated fat, the low-carb dieters reduced both their number of small,
dense LDL cholesterol and their HDL/LDL ratio to a greater degree than those
who ate a low-fat diet. In addition, triglycerides decreased by 51 percent
in the low-carb group -- compared with 19 percent in the low-fat group.

source: http://www.malepatternfitness.com/st...0/18/104946/29

Small study - still, interesting stuff!




--
Sherry
lowcarb.owly.net


  #2  
Old October 18th, 2007, 08:54 PM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Roger Zoul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,790
Default Men's Health article exerpt

UsenetID wrote:
:: Perhaps the apparent bias against saturated fat is most evident in
:: studies on low-carbohydrate diets. Many versions of this approach
:: are controversial because they place no limitations on saturated-fat
:: intake. As a result, supporters of the diet-heart hypothesis have
:: argued that low-carb diets will increase the risk of heart disease.
:: But published research doesn't show this to be the case. When people
:: on low-carb diets have been compared head-to-head with those on
:: low-fat diets, the low-carb dieters typically scored significantly
:: better on markers of heart disease, including small, dense LDL
:: cholesterol, HDL/LDL ratio, and triglycerides, which are a measure
:: of the amount of fat circulating in your blood.
:: For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut
:: scientists placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or
:: low-fat diet. Those who followed the low-carb diet consumed 36 grams
:: of saturated fat per day (22 percent of total calories), which
:: represented more than three times the amount in the low-fat diet.
:: Yet despite this considerably greater intake of saturated fat, the
:: low-carb dieters reduced both their number of small, dense LDL
:: cholesterol and their HDL/LDL ratio to a greater degree than those
:: who ate a low-fat diet. In addition, triglycerides decreased by 51
:: percent in the low-carb group -- compared with 19 percent in the
:: low-fat group.
::
:: source: http://www.malepatternfitness.com/st...0/18/104946/29
::
:: Small study - still, interesting stuff!

But at least it appears they came away with the correct conclusions.


  #3  
Old October 19th, 2007, 03:26 AM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Pat[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 305
Default Men's Health article exerpt


For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut scientists
placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or low-fat diet. --
Sherry


But, the problem is, we don't know what they mean when they say "a low-carb
diet." The Atkins diet isn't "low carb" when you include 12 weeks. By then,
it would be higher than induction by quite a bit. What do THEY consider "low
carb"?

Pat in TX




  #4  
Old October 19th, 2007, 04:20 PM posted to alt.support.diet.low-carb
Hollywood
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 896
Default Men's Health article exerpt

On Oct 18, 10:26 pm, "Pat" wrote:
For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut scientists
placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or low-fat diet. --
Sherry


But, the problem is, we don't know what they mean when they say "a low-carb
diet." The Atkins diet isn't "low carb" when you include 12 weeks. By then,
it would be higher than induction by quite a bit. What do THEY consider "low
carb"?


If it's low carb and UConn, dollars to LC Donuts, it's Jeff Volek. He
is coauthor
on Men's Health's Targeted Nutrition Tactics (TNT) Plan. The nutrition
aspects
of this plan vary depending on goals, but generally, you eat to
satiation and you
avoid the white stuff, the root veggies, sugar coke, and pretty much
everything
else high in carbs. In the study, they probably used a more defined
plan than
TNT. If you're really interested in the details, you can probably find
the study
at pubmed.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brilliant website for men's clothes norrhel General Discussion 0 July 15th, 2006 12:58 PM
Article: RX for better health jmk General Discussion 1 January 26th, 2006 08:07 PM
Men's Fitness Magazine is junk science jjp Low Carbohydrate Diets 5 January 5th, 2004 01:42 AM
Men's Fitness Magazine is junk science jjp General Discussion 0 January 4th, 2004 05:50 PM
Fat rejectance is men's revenge against women NR General Discussion 0 November 23rd, 2003 01:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.