If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Men's Health article exerpt
Perhaps the apparent bias against saturated fat is most evident in studies
on low-carbohydrate diets. Many versions of this approach are controversial because they place no limitations on saturated-fat intake. As a result, supporters of the diet-heart hypothesis have argued that low-carb diets will increase the risk of heart disease. But published research doesn't show this to be the case. When people on low-carb diets have been compared head-to-head with those on low-fat diets, the low-carb dieters typically scored significantly better on markers of heart disease, including small, dense LDL cholesterol, HDL/LDL ratio, and triglycerides, which are a measure of the amount of fat circulating in your blood. For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut scientists placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or low-fat diet. Those who followed the low-carb diet consumed 36 grams of saturated fat per day (22 percent of total calories), which represented more than three times the amount in the low-fat diet. Yet despite this considerably greater intake of saturated fat, the low-carb dieters reduced both their number of small, dense LDL cholesterol and their HDL/LDL ratio to a greater degree than those who ate a low-fat diet. In addition, triglycerides decreased by 51 percent in the low-carb group -- compared with 19 percent in the low-fat group. source: http://www.malepatternfitness.com/st...0/18/104946/29 Small study - still, interesting stuff! -- Sherry lowcarb.owly.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Men's Health article exerpt
UsenetID wrote:
:: Perhaps the apparent bias against saturated fat is most evident in :: studies on low-carbohydrate diets. Many versions of this approach :: are controversial because they place no limitations on saturated-fat :: intake. As a result, supporters of the diet-heart hypothesis have :: argued that low-carb diets will increase the risk of heart disease. :: But published research doesn't show this to be the case. When people :: on low-carb diets have been compared head-to-head with those on :: low-fat diets, the low-carb dieters typically scored significantly :: better on markers of heart disease, including small, dense LDL :: cholesterol, HDL/LDL ratio, and triglycerides, which are a measure :: of the amount of fat circulating in your blood. :: For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut :: scientists placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or :: low-fat diet. Those who followed the low-carb diet consumed 36 grams :: of saturated fat per day (22 percent of total calories), which :: represented more than three times the amount in the low-fat diet. :: Yet despite this considerably greater intake of saturated fat, the :: low-carb dieters reduced both their number of small, dense LDL :: cholesterol and their HDL/LDL ratio to a greater degree than those :: who ate a low-fat diet. In addition, triglycerides decreased by 51 :: percent in the low-carb group -- compared with 19 percent in the :: low-fat group. :: :: source: http://www.malepatternfitness.com/st...0/18/104946/29 :: :: Small study - still, interesting stuff! But at least it appears they came away with the correct conclusions. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Men's Health article exerpt
For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut scientists placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or low-fat diet. -- Sherry But, the problem is, we don't know what they mean when they say "a low-carb diet." The Atkins diet isn't "low carb" when you include 12 weeks. By then, it would be higher than induction by quite a bit. What do THEY consider "low carb"? Pat in TX |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Men's Health article exerpt
On Oct 18, 10:26 pm, "Pat" wrote:
For example, in a new 12-week study, University of Connecticut scientists placed overweight men and women on either a low-carb or low-fat diet. -- Sherry But, the problem is, we don't know what they mean when they say "a low-carb diet." The Atkins diet isn't "low carb" when you include 12 weeks. By then, it would be higher than induction by quite a bit. What do THEY consider "low carb"? If it's low carb and UConn, dollars to LC Donuts, it's Jeff Volek. He is coauthor on Men's Health's Targeted Nutrition Tactics (TNT) Plan. The nutrition aspects of this plan vary depending on goals, but generally, you eat to satiation and you avoid the white stuff, the root veggies, sugar coke, and pretty much everything else high in carbs. In the study, they probably used a more defined plan than TNT. If you're really interested in the details, you can probably find the study at pubmed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brilliant website for men's clothes | norrhel | General Discussion | 0 | July 15th, 2006 12:58 PM |
Article: RX for better health | jmk | General Discussion | 1 | January 26th, 2006 08:07 PM |
Men's Fitness Magazine is junk science | jjp | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 5 | January 5th, 2004 01:42 AM |
Men's Fitness Magazine is junk science | jjp | General Discussion | 0 | January 4th, 2004 05:50 PM |
Fat rejectance is men's revenge against women | NR | General Discussion | 0 | November 23rd, 2003 01:23 AM |