A Weightloss and diet forum. WeightLossBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » WeightLossBanter forum » alt.support.diet newsgroups » Low Carbohydrate Diets
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Keeping low carb while packing and moving



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 7th, 2004, 12:10 AM
MU
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, when people use words like
"deprived" and "condiments" in the same sentence. It's part and parcel of
one of the gravest problems that dieters have. This love of food, this
continued obsession with eating, with trying to "tweak" their food intakes
so that they can eat right to the brink of overconsumption....and still
lose or maintain weight. It's a losing game. Walking on the edge of a
cliff.


On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:36:13 +0000, Ada Ma wrote:

Your reasoning makes no sense. Love of food doesn't necessarily lead to
overconsumption. It's about quality, preparation, variety.


I am sure that you have no clue as to your own relationship with food, the
brainwashing you have been exposed to, the convoluted ideas about things
like "depraved by lack of condiments" make sense to you. Common among the
overconsumers, common among failed or to fail dieters.

As to the rest of your comment "Love of food doesn't necessarily lead to
overconsumption. It's about quality, preparation, variety", I have no idea
wth this means since your logic doesn't flow sentence to sentence.
  #22  
Old December 7th, 2004, 07:07 PM
Ada Ma
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

MU wrote:
I find it funny, and somewhat pathetic, when people use words like
"deprived" and "condiments" in the same sentence. It's part and parcel of
one of the gravest problems that dieters have. This love of food, this
continued obsession with eating, with trying to "tweak" their food intakes
so that they can eat right to the brink of overconsumption....and still
lose or maintain weight. It's a losing game. Walking on the edge of a
cliff.



On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:36:13 +0000, Ada Ma wrote:


Your reasoning makes no sense. Love of food doesn't necessarily lead to
overconsumption. It's about quality, preparation, variety.


I am sure that you have no clue as to your own relationship with food, the
brainwashing you have been exposed to, the convoluted ideas about things
like "depraved by lack of condiments" make sense to you. Common among the
overconsumers, common among failed or to fail dieters.

As to the rest of your comment "Love of food doesn't necessarily lead to
overconsumption. It's about quality, preparation, variety", I have no idea
wth this means since your logic doesn't flow sentence to sentence.


i didn't say "deprived by lack of condiments".

logic - it doesn't bother me that you don't understand my logic. can you tell a
truth table from a coffee table?

you have no idea about my comment about "quality, preparation, variety", so I
suppose you have absolutely no idea what molecular gastronomy is? preparation -
by altering the way you cook, say, a chicken, can has drastically different
effects to the texture and taste of the end product. you can, for example, try
to work out how juices flow through the chicken's flesh on a molecular level by
scanning the chicken with a MRI machine while you cook it.

what you wrote makes me wonder if you've been eating packaged stuff made by NASA
since you started dieting. are you posting from the space station? how does
the new one compared to Mir? what do you actually eat in a day?




  #23  
Old December 7th, 2004, 08:47 PM
MU
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:07:01 +0000, Ada Ma wrote:

As to the rest of your comment "Love of food doesn't necessarily lead to
overconsumption. It's about quality, preparation, variety", I have no idea
wth this means since your logic doesn't flow sentence to sentence.


i didn't say "deprived by lack of condiments".


??????????????

"And remember to take along some condiment so that you don't feel deprived"

logic - it doesn't bother me that you don't understand my logic. can you tell a
truth table from a coffee table?


Yes, one you trip over the other *you* divert.

you have no idea about my comment about "quality, preparation, variety", so I
suppose you have absolutely no idea what molecular gastronomy is?


Must have missed that getting my in my three years of Life Sciences study.
Then again, I stayed away from Advanced Cooking for Taste 330.

preparation -
by altering the way you cook, say, a chicken, can has drastically different
effects to the texture and taste of the end product. you can, for example, try
to work out how juices flow through the chicken's flesh on a molecular level by
scanning the chicken with a MRI machine while you cook it.


uh huh

what you wrote makes me wonder if you've been eating packaged stuff made by NASA
since you started dieting.


My woe of eating is on Google...repeatedly posted. Btw, that "stuff" is
highly nutritional, variable and heats up nicely without an MRI.

are you posting from the space station?


Maybe next year.

how does
the new one compared to Mir? what do you actually eat in a day?


Does sexual content apply?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 WeightLossBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.