If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Fat Bashing - "A Taste For Fat"
I pretty much like the taste of fats and oils, although sugar still has
an appeal - and chocolate. Counter to the results cited in this report, I lost my weight eating MORE FAT. This paper seems to be trying to verify or utilize the hypothesis that it is the high calorie content of fat responsible for obesity. Oh, researchers locked into the thinking of the 1950's over 50 years later. The fast food industry has long known and used the taste appeal of fats and sugars, and particularly the combination of fats and sugars together. Like Ice Cream. This is one of the themes of "the End of Overeating" by David Kessler, MD former Commissioner of the US FDA. I suppose these "scientific researchers" don't read popular books at all, and probably nothing much which disputes cherished traditions against fat. They claim to have verified that there is a separate taste for "fat". Us common folks have known that fat tastes pretty good for a long time, but didn't know that it was a separate taste. I suppose that they didn't include any low carbohydrate WOE folks in teir "fat eaters" -- just as they probably didn't correlate with total calories consumed either or the other macronutrients. Sigh! http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0310164011.htm Science News Discovery of 'Fat' Taste Could Hold the Key to Reducing Obesity ScienceDaily (Mar. 10, 2010) — A newly discovered ability for people to taste fat could hold the key to reducing obesity, Deakin University health researchers believe. Deakin researchers Dr Russell Keast and PhD student Jessica Stewart, working with colleagues at the University of Adelaide, CSIRO, and Massey University (New Zealand), have found that humans can detect a sixth taste -- fat. They also found that people with a high sensitivity to the taste of fat tended to eat less fatty foods and were less likely to be overweight. The results of their research are published in the latest issue of the British Journal of Nutrition. "Our findings build on previous research in the United States that used animal models to discover fat taste," Dr Keast said. "We know that the human tongue can detect five tastes -- sweet, salt, sour, bitter and umami (a taste for identifying protein rich foods). Through our study we can conclude that humans have a sixth taste -- fat." The research team developed a screening procedure to test the ability of people to taste a range of fatty acids commonly found in foods. They found that people have a taste threshold for fat and that these thresholds vary from person to person; some people have a high sensitivity to the taste while others do not. "Interestingly, we also found that those with a high sensitivity to the taste of fat consumed less fatty foods and had lower BMIs than those with lower sensitivity," Dr Keast said. "With fats being easily accessible and commonly consumed in diets today, this suggests that our taste system may become desensitised to the taste of fat over time, leaving some people more susceptible to overeating fatty foods. "We are now interested in understanding why some people are sensitive and others are not, which we believe will lead to ways of helping people lower their fat intakes and aide development of new low fat foods and diets." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New Fat Bashing - "A Taste For Fat"
In article ,
pamela wrote: I suppose that they didn't include any low carbohydrate WOE folks in teir "fat eaters" -- just as they probably didn't correlate with total calories consumed either or the other macronutrients. Outside the low carbers and a few other health nuts, everybody in the US certainly is maintaining on sugar and the others are mostly glucose addicts. Even some low carbers believe that whole grains are better than the refined stuff. Beside the paradigm is carbs making up the bulk of the diet. People lie awake nights trying to figure new ways to get it into new foods, that is if they can't put HFCS in them. HCFS is basically the same as sugar anyway. Many moons ago when I was into low fat dieting, I looked at a package of brown rice for the nutritional content and saw it was mostly carbohydrates even the amount of fiber was not impressive. "Must have some other benefit", I thought. That was back in the day, I was being told to cut my fat to 5% by calories. Brown rice has 7% and apples have 5%. Hard to do a diet of whole foods on that WOE. -- A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
New Fat Bashing - "A Taste For Fat"
On Mar 11, 5:07*pm, Walter Bushell wrote:
In article , *pamela wrote: I suppose that they didn't include any low carbohydrate WOE folks in teir "fat eaters" -- just as they probably didn't correlate with total calories consumed either or the other macronutrients. Outside the low carbers and a few other health nuts, everybody in the US certainly is maintaining on sugar and the others are mostly glucose addicts. Even some low carbers believe that whole grains are better than the refined stuff. Beside the paradigm is carbs making up the bulk of the diet. People lie awake nights trying to figure new ways to get it into new foods, that is if they can't put HFCS in them. HCFS is basically the same as sugar anyway. Many moons ago when I was into low fat dieting, I looked at a package of brown rice for the nutritional content and saw it was mostly carbohydrates even the amount of fiber was not impressive. "Must have some other benefit", I thought. That was back in the day, I was being told to cut my fat to 5% by calories. Brown rice has 7% and apples have 5%. Hard to do a diet of whole foods on that WOE. -- *A computer without Microsoft is like a chocolate cake without mustard. I don't see how what they describe doing proves they discovered that fat is a sixth taste sense. From what's in that article, all they proved was that different people have different taste sensitivity to fatty acids. It says nothing about it being a seperate and new taste sensation that is different than the existing ones. Suppose I gave people small amounts of sulfur to taste. Some can taste and react to smaller amounts than others, demonstrating a differing sensitivity to it. Does that make sulfur another seventh taste? As for people having varying degrees of sensitivity to different tastes, that hardly comes as a surprise to me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BLIMPS REJOICE! "Grilled" At KFC Means You Can Gobble More Pieces OfChicken Than The Original "Boogies On A Bone" Fried Artery-Cloggers! | Lil' Barb | General Discussion | 2 | November 25th, 2009 08:47 AM |
BUSH NATION: 36.2 Million Human Beings HUNGRY! Your "CompassionateConservative" Says, "Hell, Ah'm Retirin' Soon." | Kilicrankie P. Smith | General Discussion | 2 | November 19th, 2008 04:10 PM |
Splenda "Minis" Tablets - Disappointing Taste ? | Jim | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | August 25th, 2007 03:39 AM |
"Friends are born, not made." !!!! By: "Henry Brooks Adams" | [email protected] | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | February 1st, 2007 04:27 PM |
Mark Twain's "Smoking is Good for You" , and "Being Fat Can SaveYour Life" | Jbuch | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 0 | January 20th, 2007 03:20 PM |