If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep
into your bank account in a courtroom. "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: ...and why would anybody believe you with your history on NGs? Because it can be checked. Simple. Check it and see for yourself. Bob "Stephen Nagler" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:09:59 -0500, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote: You poor guy. Christ has reduced you to this. http://makeashorterlink.com/?A20055A37 ............... Andrew, Andrew, cut Steve here some slack for goodness sakes. He was just being a little sarcastic. Sort of like you were doing when you "sarcastically" informed the American Medical Association that you had staff privileges at Piedmont Hospital, Crawfor Long Hospital, and the Atlanta VA -- when in truth you never had staff privileges at any of the three! Tell us, oh "humble" man of Christ -- why the lie to the American Medical Association? A truly humble man would have no need to falsely inflate his resume! smn |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Ear Rings wrote:
I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. To whom are you directing this comment? And whose hands are in whose pockets? And, finally, why don't you go do a little research about the whole subject of libel so you don't say still more silly things. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: ...and why would anybody believe you with your history on NGs? Because it can be checked. Simple. Check it and see for yourself. Bob "Stephen Nagler" wrote in message om... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:09:59 -0500, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote: You poor guy. Christ has reduced you to this. http://makeashorterlink.com/?A20055A37 ............... Andrew, Andrew, cut Steve here some slack for goodness sakes. He was just being a little sarcastic. Sort of like you were doing when you "sarcastically" informed the American Medical Association that you had staff privileges at Piedmont Hospital, Crawfor Long Hospital, and the Atlanta VA -- when in truth you never had staff privileges at any of the three! Tell us, oh "humble" man of Christ -- why the lie to the American Medical Association? A truly humble man would have no need to falsely inflate his resume! smn |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Man you're touchy when people get close.
"Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. To whom are you directing this comment? And whose hands are in whose pockets? And, finally, why don't you go do a little research about the whole subject of libel so you don't say still more silly things. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: ...and why would anybody believe you with your history on NGs? Because it can be checked. Simple. Check it and see for yourself. Bob "Stephen Nagler" wrote in message om... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:09:59 -0500, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote: You poor guy. Christ has reduced you to this. http://makeashorterlink.com/?A20055A37 ............... Andrew, Andrew, cut Steve here some slack for goodness sakes. He was just being a little sarcastic. Sort of like you were doing when you "sarcastically" informed the American Medical Association that you had staff privileges at Piedmont Hospital, Crawfor Long Hospital, and the Atlanta VA -- when in truth you never had staff privileges at any of the three! Tell us, oh "humble" man of Christ -- why the lie to the American Medical Association? A truly humble man would have no need to falsely inflate his resume! smn |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Ear Rings wrote:
Man you're touchy when people get close. Nah. I get inquisitive when people say stupid **** stuff that's about as clear as your writing - Oh, wait. It was about your writing. That's why I've asked you questions. And, in a spirit of generosity, offered you advice obviously too complex for you to grasp. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. To whom are you directing this comment? And whose hands are in whose pockets? And, finally, why don't you go do a little research about the whole subject of libel so you don't say still more silly things. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: ...and why would anybody believe you with your history on NGs? Because it can be checked. Simple. Check it and see for yourself. Bob "Stephen Nagler" wrote in message news:fqng10l2ncn67qo7pjkm0k1rej8eqa7pf1@4ax .com... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:09:59 -0500, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote: You poor guy. Christ has reduced you to this. http://makeashorterlink.com/?A20055A37 ............... Andrew, Andrew, cut Steve here some slack for goodness sakes. He was just being a little sarcastic. Sort of like you were doing when you "sarcastically" informed the American Medical Association that you had staff privileges at Piedmont Hospital, Crawfor Long Hospital, and the Atlanta VA -- when in truth you never had staff privileges at any of the three! Tell us, oh "humble" man of Christ -- why the lie to the American Medical Association? A truly humble man would have no need to falsely inflate his resume! smn |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Well, the Chung roll is doing its ignorent blusdtering through another name
SUE us you stupid ****ing troll! Ear Rings wrote: I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: ...and why would anybody believe you with your history on NGs? Because it can be checked. Simple. Check it and see for yourself. Bob "Stephen Nagler" wrote in message om... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:09:59 -0500, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote: You poor guy. Christ has reduced you to this. http://makeashorterlink.com/?A20055A37 ............... Andrew, Andrew, cut Steve here some slack for goodness sakes. He was just being a little sarcastic. Sort of like you were doing when you "sarcastically" informed the American Medical Association that you had staff privileges at Piedmont Hospital, Crawfor Long Hospital, and the Atlanta VA -- when in truth you never had staff privileges at any of the three! Tell us, oh "humble" man of Christ -- why the lie to the American Medical Association? A truly humble man would have no need to falsely inflate his resume! smn |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Man your stupid
when you make ignorent threats Ear Rings wrote: Man you're touchy when people get close. "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. To whom are you directing this comment? And whose hands are in whose pockets? And, finally, why don't you go do a little research about the whole subject of libel so you don't say still more silly things. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob "Bob" wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: ...and why would anybody believe you with your history on NGs? Because it can be checked. Simple. Check it and see for yourself. Bob "Stephen Nagler" wrote in message news:fqng10l2ncn67qo7pjkm0k1rej8eqa7pf1@4ax .com... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:09:59 -0500, "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote: You poor guy. Christ has reduced you to this. http://makeashorterlink.com/?A20055A37 ............... Andrew, Andrew, cut Steve here some slack for goodness sakes. He was just being a little sarcastic. Sort of like you were doing when you "sarcastically" informed the American Medical Association that you had staff privileges at Piedmont Hospital, Crawfor Long Hospital, and the Atlanta VA -- when in truth you never had staff privileges at any of the three! Tell us, oh "humble" man of Christ -- why the lie to the American Medical Association? A truly humble man would have no need to falsely inflate his resume! smn |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Bob wrote:
Ear Rings wrote: I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. desperate frothing-at-the-mouth hissing snipped You poor guy. You remain in my prayers, neighbor. FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a few suggestions: (1) Yell at Bob (2) Report Bob to his ISP (3) Killfile this thread. (4) Killfile me. (5) Read about free speech. This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is described completely at: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks He touched: http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument soundly at every point: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion thread(s). However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger." Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars. These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following observations were made: (1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously. (2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the discussion(s). (a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to achieve near-ideal weight. (b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight becomes near-ideal. (c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/levc (3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s). (4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive). (5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs of the actual diplomas). Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio: http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their fallen hero. Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line third-party resources at: http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked. Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack): (1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or accountability). (2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters. (3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided insults. (4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting. (5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its author. and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file. It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed. It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the din of hissing from the peanut gallery. Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ -- Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147 |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
LAUGHING AT DR. ANDREW B. CHUNG WAS: Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (orWhyDoesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Bob wrote:
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Steve wrote: On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:22:19 -0500, Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote (in message ): Bob wrote in message ... Ear Rings wrote: I have checked it and it speaks for itself. Checked what? And what does "speaks for itself" mean? That Chung really does have hospital privileges? Of course, Chung has no hospital privileges even though he claims to. Do you think the above is wise, neighbor? Lies are common for this person. Give it up, ears. These non-answers just look like the ranting of an obsessive. Whatever you think of Stephen, Chung is a demonstrated, proven documented liar. These are just more of his normal modus operandi. Bob That says a lot coming from a proven libeler :-) http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp What a laugh! Do you see Pastorio laughing ? hysterically maniacal laughter snipped You poor guy. You remain in my prayers, neighbor. FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a few suggestions: (1) Yell at Bob (2) Report Bob to his ISP (3) Killfile this thread. (4) Killfile me. (5) Read about free speech. This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is described completely at: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks He touched: http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument soundly at every point: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion thread(s). However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger." Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars. These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following observations were made: (1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously. (2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the discussion(s). (a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to achieve near-ideal weight. (b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight becomes near-ideal. (c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/levc (3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s). (4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive). (5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs of the actual diplomas). Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio: http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their fallen hero. Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line third-party resources at: http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked. Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack): (1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or accountability). (2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters. (3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided insults. (4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting. (5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its author. and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file. It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed. It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the din of hissing from the peanut gallery. Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ -- Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147 |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Bob wrote:
Ear Rings wrote: Man you're touchy when people get close. hissing snipped You poor guy. You remain in my prayers, neighbor. FYI Note: I am aware that I am responding to a cross-posted message. Because the author of the message to which I am responding did not request that the header be trimmed, I have not trimmed it. If you are upset about reading this message, a few suggestions: (1) Yell at Bob (2) Report Bob to his ISP (3) Killfile this thread. (4) Killfile me. (5) Read about free speech. This discussion(s) is related to the 2 pound diet approach (2PD) which is described completely at: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp Though Dr. Chung invented this approach, he did not initiate the Usenet discussion(s). His participation in this discussion(s) has been voluntary and has been conducted in the spirit of community service. His motivation has been entirely altruistic and has arisen from his religious beliefs as a Christian. Jesus freely gave of Himself to better the health of folks He touched: http://www.heartmdphd.com/healer.asp From the outset, it has been clear that there are those who are vehemently opposed to the 2 pound diet approach. They have debated Dr. Chung on every perceived weakness of the 2 pound diet approach and have lost the argument soundly at every point: http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtlossfaqs.asp These debates are archived on Google in their entirety within this discussion thread(s). However, instead of conceding gracefully that they've lost the argument(s), certain parties have redirected their hatred of the 2 pound diet approach toward its author. The rationale appears to be "if you can not discredit the message then try to discredit the messenger." Initially, these folks accused the messenger of "trolling." A "troll" is someone who posts under the cloak of anonymity messages with no redeeming discussion value and with the sole purpose of starting "flame" wars. These hateful folks lost credibility with this accusation when the following observations were made: (1) Dr. Chung has not been posting anonymously. (2) The 2PD has been on-topic for the Usenet discussion groups hosting the discussion(s). (a) Those who are failing low-carbing can dovetail LC with the 2PD to achieve near-ideal weight. (b) Obese diabetics improve their blood glucose control when their weight becomes near-ideal. (c) For (b) see: http://tinyurl.com/levc (3) Dr. Chung did not start the discussion(s). (4) The 2 pound diet approach is 100% free (no profit motive). (5) Dr. Chung's credentials are real and easily verified on-line (including jpegs of the actual diplomas). Full of hatred, frustration, and desperation, certain individuals have tried to attack Dr. Chung's credentials knowing full well that they were attempting to libel him. One notable example is Mr. Pastorio: http://www.heartmdphd.com/libel.asp When the full light was cast on Mr. Pastorio's libelous statements, the hateful folks hiding in the darkness of anonymity only hissed louder in support of their fallen hero. Fortunately, those who have been following this discussion(s) either actively or as lurkers can easily dismiss the hisses, for what they are, using the on-line third-party resources at: http://www.heartmdphd.com/profile.asp where Dr. Chung's credentials can be verified many times over and libelous claims that credentials were bought are easily and summarily debunked. Moreover, readers need only make the following observations concerning the anon posters who continue to hiss (ie JC Der Koenig and Mack): (1) They are anonymous and thus they expect to have no credibility (or accountability). (2) They are by their Usenet history courtesy of Google, unsavory characters. (3) They have not added anything to the discussion(s) except to deliver one-sided insults. (4) They complain about alleged cross-posts from Dr. Chung by cross-posting. (5) They do not complain about cross-posts from folks who attack the 2PD or its author. and conclude that these anon posters deserve only their kill file. It is my hope that the above brings new readers of this thread up to speed. It will remain my pleasure to continue the discussion(s) about the 2PD above the din of hissing from the peanut gallery. Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ -- Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L21532147 |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Chung FAQ, Issue 1 (or Why Doesn't He Just Shut Up?)
Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Bob wrote: Ear Rings wrote: I wonder how deep you pockets are with somebody putting there hands deeeeep into your bank account in a courtroom. desperate frothing-at-the-mouth hissing snipped How desperate is Chung to censor all comment with his snipping of anything that doesn't agree with his cultist, extremist, Taliban-like behavior. The insanely dictatorial Taliban, like Chung, tried to refuse to permit any expression that didn't agree with theirs. Like all would-be, tinhorn dictators, Chung tries to stifle or at least divert dissent and demonstration of how corrupt he is. A frantic tapdance of lies and dissembling distortions. Poor Chung. A failed man. A quack, a liar, a fraud. Poor impotent Chung who can't stop any of it but can only frenziedly scrabble in the dirt in his panic to defeat his legion of rational critics. Who can't disprove the truth of any of it. Does Chung still insist that 2 pounds of potatoes contain 3600 calories? Does Chung still say that all proceeds of his web site (that doesn't generate any revenue) are being donated to charity? Fraudulent, hubris-filled Chung. Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret | Diarmid Logan | General Discussion | 135 | February 14th, 2004 04:56 PM |