If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439966.dE4KFD5Ibd8ViCjlNu5RGw@teranews: Don Kirkman wrote: It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in article 1095341701.XLDSFQggs0dyjqK+1/pGYg@teranews: Owen Lowe wrote: In article , MU wrote: snipped way too much for any reasonable person to take time to read I see you value the (your) time to input such a ridiculously long response equals, as always, your unrealistic expectation that there is a significant return on your effort. That many will read and be convinced. Such it is with the prideful, self absorbed ego. Well,Mu, I found it rather interesting - guess I'm an unreasonable person... No, if you found it interesting, you probably have a tendency to "live to eat rather than eat to live." Many lead food-centric lives like yourself and Bob. They also tend to have the greatest difficulty eating less and losing weight. Yes, like me. Does not surprise me. Nor am I surprised that you continue to falsely attribute doctored statements to those you oppose--out of "love" and "truth," I suppose. What I wrote was Yes, like me. I found it interesting, too. I love to eat (and run and surf the internet and discuss meaningful issues and do a bit of yard work and some of the household shopping); 150 lbs at 6'0". But I've worked toward becoming unreasonable in discussing questionable propositions. Oh, typo. should be "I live to eat." Now we can add your inane response: "Does not surprise me". -- Don |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439968.cCTrVg2SxpM608tlpkChfg@teranews: Don Kirkman wrote: It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bob (this one) wrote in article : Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Mirek Fidler wrote: Average typical daily American intake probably exceeds 1 pound of meat daily (many American folks will routinely eat a 12-16 oz of steak for just dinner). This would be more than 450 grams. Note *probably* - it's a guess. And note all the assumptions pulled out of thin air. I've been wondering just how many "American folks will routinely eat a 12-16 oz of steak for just dinner." IME of several decades few families have steak even once a week, and usually much less than 3/4 to one pound steaks at that. Eight ounces, maybe. Those 12-16 ouncers are supersized restaurant portions, and common folks don't eat out regularly at steak houses. Meat-eating obese folks do. Andrew, you're apparently degenerating into a simpleminded transparent troll. But I love to play with trolls. :-) -- Don |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
in article 1095439968.cCTrVg2SxpM608tlpkChfg@teranews: Don Kirkman wrote: It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bob (this one) wrote in article : Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Mirek Fidler wrote: Average typical daily American intake probably exceeds 1 pound of meat daily (many American folks will routinely eat a 12-16 oz of steak for just dinner). This would be more than 450 grams. Note *probably* - it's a guess. And note all the assumptions pulled out of thin air. I've been wondering just how many "American folks will routinely eat a 12-16 oz of steak for just dinner." IME of several decades few families have steak even once a week, and usually much less than 3/4 to one pound steaks at that. Eight ounces, maybe. Those 12-16 ouncers are supersized restaurant portions, and common folks don't eat out regularly at steak houses. Meat-eating obese folks do. Andrew, you're apparently degenerating into a simpleminded transparent troll. But I love to play with trolls. :-) -- Don |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Don Kirkman wrote:
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in article 1095439968.cCTrVg2SxpM608tlpkChfg@teranews: Don Kirkman wrote: It seems to me I heard somewhere that Bob (this one) wrote in article : Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Mirek Fidler wrote: Average typical daily American intake probably exceeds 1 pound of meat daily (many American folks will routinely eat a 12-16 oz of steak for just dinner). This would be more than 450 grams. Note *probably* - it's a guess. And note all the assumptions pulled out of thin air. I've been wondering just how many "American folks will routinely eat a 12-16 oz of steak for just dinner." IME of several decades few families have steak even once a week, and usually much less than 3/4 to one pound steaks at that. Eight ounces, maybe. Those 12-16 ouncers are supersized restaurant portions, and common folks don't eat out regularly at steak houses. Meat-eating obese folks do. Andrew, you're apparently degenerating into a simpleminded transparent troll. Ouch. You may have at the other cheek. But I love to play with trolls. :-) Your self-worship does not surprise me either. -- Don You remain in my prayers, dear Don whom I love. You remain in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love. Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48 Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867 |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Don Kirkman wrote:
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in article 1095439966.dE4KFD5Ibd8ViCjlNu5RGw@teranews: Don Kirkman wrote: It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in article 1095341701.XLDSFQggs0dyjqK+1/pGYg@teranews: Owen Lowe wrote: In article , MU wrote: snipped way too much for any reasonable person to take time to read I see you value the (your) time to input such a ridiculously long response equals, as always, your unrealistic expectation that there is a significant return on your effort. That many will read and be convinced. Such it is with the prideful, self absorbed ego. Well,Mu, I found it rather interesting - guess I'm an unreasonable person... No, if you found it interesting, you probably have a tendency to "live to eat rather than eat to live." Many lead food-centric lives like yourself and Bob. They also tend to have the greatest difficulty eating less and losing weight. Yes, like me. Does not surprise me. Nor am I surprised I know. You remain in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love. Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48 Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867 |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote: No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot. "Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...? Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you know how many pounds you ate? |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote: No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot. "Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...? Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you know how many pounds you ate? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Bob (this one)" wrote: No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot. "Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...? Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you know how many pounds you ate? |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Owen Lowe wrote:
In article , "Bob (this one)" wrote: No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot. "Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...? Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you know how many pounds you ate? And what about cutting meat into several pieces... division everywhere... LOL Bob |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Owen Lowe wrote:
In article , "Bob (this one)" wrote: No multiplication. Addition and subtraction. Idiot. "Remember...?" So if you eat 13.78 ounces for breakfast, you have to recall it all day long? And lunch is 12.63 ounces and you need to remember that, too. and do the arithmetic to keep you on track So it leaves you only, um, 5.59 ounces for dinner, right? And you remember that every day, even when you're doing your secret missions behind enemy lines and have to use the tiny kind of scales drug dealers use on tv? Or do you not weigh everything? In which case, it's estimating and how can that be any more accurate than calorie counting...? Ahhhh, but one does need to implement division... else how would you know how many pounds you ate? And what about cutting meat into several pieces... division everywhere... LOL Bob |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret | Diarmid Logan | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 142 | February 14th, 2004 02:26 PM |
Uncovering the Atkins diet secret | tcomeau | Low Calorie | 113 | February 14th, 2004 02:26 PM |
Patient Information | John Jessup | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 25 | February 11th, 2004 11:21 PM |
Pastorio TROLLS Hard; Makes Fool Out Of Himself. | Home, Home On The Mu_n | General Discussion | 0 | February 6th, 2004 05:20 PM |
2PD question, seriously | Luna | Low Carbohydrate Diets | 33 | February 4th, 2004 06:14 PM |