nyny not too bad

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:54:18 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

What did you do with your NEW body while you were rollin around in the snow
with the OLD one? Or whats her name? would be the other smart a comment to

Ah, the ol' "I did not wake up grumpy, I let her sleep!" (G)

Actually, the new body must be in pretty good shape - I remember doing
this trip last year and struggling a bit more. I was surprised at how
early it was when I stopped for my SECOND lunch (G) Leaving on these
trips early - one tends to snack somewhere around 10am with the first
lunch and then eat again around noon.


that one. I am on a major roll this week feeling SOOOO renewed after living
through turkey day and ending up with my scale saying 159 again. I am gonna
be hard to beat this week, unless you kept some of your fabulous recent
loss.........

I do hope I can disappoint you!!! I seem to be holding reasonably
well (fingers crossed). Maybe thanksgiving and awful pies helps!!!
(G)

But clearly this means that I cannot weighin in full regalia. It will
be your fault as I shiver in shorts. (g)

La

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

Oh, that stupid peak that started out with a mail box (I had mail up
there for ages, apparently, but never made it). And now has a full
extension ladder and a real and HEAVY fire hydrant? No one quite
knows how the hydrant got up there (unless your article says) since it
is cast iron and very weighty.

A friend has always said it is too steep and might lead to injuries
whereas other friends have challenged me to do it. Being stubborn, I
do what I want - and am saving my knees.

Wonder if the article is on the web?

A friend sent me photos of the junk collection up there (G)

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:16:36 -0800, "Deb in Northern California"
wrote:

Hey Fred,

I was reading and article in the travel section of my newspaper yesterday
and was wondering if you have ever been to Mailbox Peak in Washington,
apparently it is in the mountains outside of the Seattle area. I thought of
you when reading it.

Debbie


"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

If anybody is interested, here's a link with a photo:

http://www.thehollandsentinel.net/st...52903036.shtml

I guess the ladder was not up there yet.

On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:16:36 -0800, "Deb in Northern California"
wrote:

Hey Fred,

I was reading and article in the travel section of my newspaper yesterday
and was wondering if you have ever been to Mailbox Peak in Washington,
apparently it is in the mountains outside of the Seattle area. I thought of
you when reading it.

Debbie


"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

I guess it is time to resort to court stuff again - I plead the Fifth.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:56:55 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

So how old are you Fred? You don't Look old. You better be older than I am
if you are out there referring to yourself as OLD. Watch it now.

La

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

Ah hah - your silence will therefore be taken as incriminating (even though
the court will be instructed not to do such a thing). So, like, you're
REALLY old then? *grin* Not possible - your sense of humour is too
juvenile.........*teee hee hee *

--
krys

UK 157/135.6/126
Started March 1st 2001
GOAL August 16th 2001
struggling now.......

"Fred" wrote in message
...
I guess it is time to resort to court stuff again - I plead the Fifth.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:56:55 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

So how old are you Fred? You don't Look old. You better be older than I
am
if you are out there referring to yourself as OLD. Watch it now.

best part of the artificial eye thing is when you have to go to ER for some
reason and the ER dr. insists on trying to get a pupil reaction. Do you
know how many dr.'s really can hurl is confronted with an unexpected
situation, Lee, small evil giggle, when I want a shot for a migraine, I will
do whatever will get it faster!!!
Fred wrote in message
...
My dad lost one eye to glaucoma but it was stopped before the other
eye got too bad. His glass eye was so good that I never knew which
eye needed the medicine.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:10:57 GMT, "Miss Violette"
wrote:

I used to be able to see well enough to do everything but drive. I was
blessed with an extremely rare kind of glaucoma and through the wizardry
of
science, scapules and drugs was able to keep my sight well into my
twenties,
and i have worked extremely hard to retain memories that were/are
important
to me. Not at all offended, if more people were open about their
disabilities there would be less fear and therefore less discrimination
throught society, Lee, getting older all the time...
Fred wrote in message
.. .
I hope you do not mind me asking (just ignore if you do). I read your
messages and I know you have a seeing disability but sometimes from
you comments it sounds as if you have some sight? Or is that just the
way language is used?

Fred who is OLDER and more beat up than the messages would portray.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 12:32:29 GMT, "Miss Violette"
wrote:

I was thinking, maybe its good I can't see the pictures, Lee
Erin Marsh wrote in message
.co.nz...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

--
Erin in NZ
125/89/75 kgs
275.3/196/165 lbs

NYNY goal 180.6lbs (82 kilos)

"It is not the mountain we conquer, it is ourselves"
Sir Edmund Hilary

Ah haha. You better be prepared to weigh in shorts I am having a very good
week over here.

"Fred" wrote in message
...


On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:54:18 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

What did you do with your NEW body while you were rollin around in the
snow
with the OLD one? Or whats her name? would be the other smart a comment
to

Ah, the ol' "I did not wake up grumpy, I let her sleep!" (G)

Actually, the new body must be in pretty good shape - I remember doing
this trip last year and struggling a bit more. I was surprised at how
early it was when I stopped for my SECOND lunch (G) Leaving on these
trips early - one tends to snack somewhere around 10am with the first
lunch and then eat again around noon.


that one. I am on a major roll this week feeling SOOOO renewed after
living
through turkey day and ending up with my scale saying 159 again. I am
gonna
be hard to beat this week, unless you kept some of your fabulous recent
loss.........

I do hope I can disappoint you!!! I seem to be holding reasonably
well (fingers crossed). Maybe thanksgiving and awful pies helps!!!
(G)

But clearly this means that I cannot weighin in full regalia. It will
be your fault as I shiver in shorts. (g)

La

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

hmmm the Fifth decade, or could you actually BE old, like 70 or something.
Somehow I doubt it, you are too lively, although I did have a friend who was
a tennis terror at 85.

"Fred" wrote in message
...
I guess it is time to resort to court stuff again - I plead the Fifth.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:56:55 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

So how old are you Fred? You don't Look old. You better be older than I
am
if you are out there referring to yourself as OLD. Watch it now.

La

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)

goooood one...
That would also be how everyone could tell I am not at all old.

"krys" wrote in message
...
Ah hah - your silence will therefore be taken as incriminating (even
though
the court will be instructed not to do such a thing). So, like, you're
REALLY old then? *grin* Not possible - your sense of humour is too
juvenile.........*teee hee hee *

--
krys

UK 157/135.6/126
Started March 1st 2001
GOAL August 16th 2001
struggling now.......

"Fred" wrote in message
...
I guess it is time to resort to court stuff again - I plead the Fifth.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:56:55 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

So how old are you Fred? You don't Look old. You better be older than
I
am
if you are out there referring to yourself as OLD. Watch it now.

Well, this morning was not as good as hoped.

But you really have a great chance in about two weeks - we have our
work "employee recognition breakfast" early the morning of WI. I will
be dressed in jacket, tie, slacks, etc and will have breakfast and
then head to WI! Not a great situtation unless I can sit with 300
others eating breakfast and NOT eat breakfast!

But maybe it is time to just let you have it as I would really hate to
be the one to drive you to desparation. Besides, some others are now
giving you a run for the money.

On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:45:52 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

Ah haha. You better be prepared to weigh in shorts I am having a very good
week over here.

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .


On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:54:18 GMT, "Lesanne"
wrote:

What did you do with your NEW body while you were rollin around in the
snow
with the OLD one? Or whats her name? would be the other smart a comment
to

Ah, the ol' "I did not wake up grumpy, I let her sleep!" (G)

Actually, the new body must be in pretty good shape - I remember doing
this trip last year and struggling a bit more. I was surprised at how
early it was when I stopped for my SECOND lunch (G) Leaving on these
trips early - one tends to snack somewhere around 10am with the first
lunch and then eat again around noon.


that one. I am on a major roll this week feeling SOOOO renewed after
living
through turkey day and ending up with my scale saying 159 again. I am
gonna
be hard to beat this week, unless you kept some of your fabulous recent
loss.........

I do hope I can disappoint you!!! I seem to be holding reasonably
well (fingers crossed). Maybe thanksgiving and awful pies helps!!!
(G)

But clearly this means that I cannot weighin in full regalia. It will
be your fault as I shiver in shorts. (g)

La

"Fred" wrote in message
.. .
Well, ahem, within reason. (G)

Dragged the OLD body out on a snowshoe trip yesterday. Glorious in
the mountains but the snow was definitely not my definition of
skiable.

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:58:06 +1300, Erin Marsh
wrote:

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:34:57 -0800, Fred
wrote:

Okay, that is it!!!! (G)

Aw, c'mon Fred. Admit it, you're loving the attention ;-)