I remember when I first looked at the chart. I kind of shrugged my
shoulders and figured if I lost about 20 pounds I would be very happy.
I concentrated most thought on the 10% goal. I never expected to
reach the WW goal to be honest. But it happened over the weeks and
months.

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:35:33 -0600, "buck naked"
wrote:


Hope it helps??? I'm depressed now....my target weight is 116-140....aye
caramba

"Connie" wrote in message
...
The ranges can be found at:

http://www.weigh****chers.com/health...thyweight.aspx

Hope this helps.

Connie

Fred wrote:
Joyce probably found the correct values. I knew the ones you posted
were wrong since I'm 5'8" and my top of range is 164, so 2 inches
taller would be higher. Someone at WW may have made a mistake or
misread the chart.

Yes, WW first assigns a 10% loss. And I set my secondary goal at a
2nd ten percent. Then I set the WW goal.

But in any event, get below 200 will be a great step.

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:38:22 -0600, Richard wrote:


Fred wrote in
news

WW has charts. The only break is that older folks (was it over 45??
or 50??) get to be slightly higher. No difference for men or women.
It is based on height.


My first assigned goal is 225#. The assigned ultimate goal is 161#. I
feel this is unrealistic for a man 5' 10" and 65 years old. I have no
desire to weigh that little. I'd be all bones. My personal goal is
177#.





--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/204/155
RAFL 210.5/204/198.5