"*bicker*" wrote in message
. ..
A 4 Nov 2004 01:57:26 GMT, Ignoramus14916
escribió:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 20:53:09 -0500, *bicker*
wrote:
A 3 Nov 2004 15:56:45 GMT, Ignoramus14916
escribió:
They do not work very well.
They actually are the most effective ways for obese people
to lose weight long-term.
Do you have evidence for it?

Yes, and I've provided the citations to you in the past.

I do have to worry about your diet, though, since it seems
to have caused memory loss. See a doctor.

--
bicker®
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/D...ry_040602.html

You forget that ignoranus never lets facts get in the way of his version of
reality. Wasn't it only a few weeks ago that you were having this
discussion and he was so complementary of your success? The discussion was
about how something like 65% of the subjects didn't gain more than 50% of
their weight back? Now that he's being challenged on his stupid
generalizations he's getting defensive and snarky again.

**Disclaimer** I don't recall the exact details and I don't feel like
googling it. It might have even been more than just a few weeks ago and the
65% might be wrong too. I don't have a head for numbers which doesn't make
me a liar, just someone better at reading than at math. This disclaimer is
added because ignoranus is a pathetic moron who has decided that my habit of
truncating decimals makes me a liar while his habit of intentionally taking
information out of context constitutes reality.

Jenn